To Advertise On Our Website Click Here

Posts Tagged ‘U.S. Chamber of Commerce’


Friday, October 29th, 2010

If Republicans achieve their expected gains in next week’s election, probably the first Obama Administration position they will attack will be the coming EPA effort to regulate carbon emissions.
A broad coalition of business and industry groups – including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Petroleum Institute, the National Manufacturers Association and the American Chemistry Council – fired the first shot yesterday, asking Republican leaders to take on the EPA as soon as the House and Senate reconvene for the lame-duck session.  The most likely target is a moratorium on the rulemaking attached to either an omnibus budget or new continuing resolution.
The threat to allow the EPA to start writing carbon regulations was the sword the President held over Congress’s head during his efforts to pass cap-and-trade or some other carbon regime. Many speculated it was only a gambit but now the Administration is obligated to follow through.
Business and industry, on the other hand, argue that the EPA effort would impose “substantial costs and burdens on U.S. jobs and state resources while intruding on Congress’s important leadership role in developing energy policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” 
The EPA regulations, based the U.S. Supreme Court decision that declared carbon dioxide a “pollutant,” are aimed mainly at stationary sources, notably power plants. Significantly, they will require clearance before any new sources can be added to a state’s air shed. Utility owners are already arguing they will be forced to delay the construction of new capacity, even relatively clean natural gas plants intended to replace old coal plants.
The business and industry group’s letter was addressed to two Republicans and eight Democrats, including Mary Landrieu, of Louisiana, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, all of whom represent states with strong dependence on coal.

Read more at the Hill



Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

In Korea, they are teaching children to marvel at nuclear energy. In the U.S., we are encouraging them to worry about coal.That seems to be the essence of a new lesson plan put out by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – and it’s already causing controversy. "Shedding Light on Energy," published in conjunction with Scholastic, draws on data from the Energy Information Administration to show middle schoolers where we get our energy. 

It also suggests that government regulation might have an impact on these sources.  What they seem to have in mind is coal and the EPA’s draconian warnings that the time has come (next January) to start cracking down on old coal plants.“What do you think could happen if one of our energy sources was suddenly unavailable (e.g., power plant maintenance, government curb on production, etc.)?” the guide asks.

The lesson plan has roused the usual complaints. “It sounds like this may be one part education and one part fear-mongering,” says Dan Weiss, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. “They’re going to be carrying the message of a very opinionated special interest.

Our guess is Scholastic will not be giving equal time to the Sierra Club.”But of course the whole  public school curriculum is now built around the Sierra Club agenda.  Fourth graders come home lecturing their parents about global warming.  Eighth graders are in tears because of what we are doing to Mother Earth. Lost in all this is the technological promise that could come with a greater appreciation for nuclear energy and other resources.

Read more at Politico